ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Critique of MiBACT's Utility and Cost in Italian Cultural Policy

opinion-review · 2026-05-05

In an opinion article for Artribune, Stefano Monti raises doubts about the relevance of the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism (MiBACT), asserting that its expenses outweigh the advantages. He proposes that other ministries could effectively oversee initiatives like the Artbonus tax incentive. Monti critiques the arbitrary allocation of resources to museums and observes that Italy's cultural influence internationally pales in comparison to that of its artists, with the actual market for Italian art located overseas. He points out difficulties faced by local auction houses and collectors in navigating Italy's notification laws. Monti argues that MiBACT's strategies are primarily influenced by budget limitations, referencing cuts to the Fondo Unico per lo Spettacolo and questioning the rationale behind its €1.1 billion personnel costs amid total expenses of €1.6 billion.

Key facts

  • MiBACT costs €1.6 billion annually, with €1.1 billion for personnel.
  • Only €500 million of MiBACT's budget goes to non-personnel expenses.
  • €400 million of that is for the Fondo Unico per lo Spettacolo.
  • Just over €100 million is for cultural heritage.
  • Artbonus tax incentive and cinema tax reforms could be handled by Ministry of Finance.
  • Italian art market is stronger abroad, with Italian Sales in England.
  • Notification laws from Fascist era are criticized as excessive.
  • Roberto Cecchi's book 'Abecedario' provides budget breakdown.

Entities

Artists

  • Salvatore Settis

Institutions

  • MiBACT
  • Artribune
  • Ministry of Finance
  • Fondo Unico per lo Spettacolo
  • Film Commission
  • Monti&Taft

Locations

  • Italy
  • England

Sources