Control-Theoretic Governance for Multi-LLM Agent Conversations
An arXiv paper (2608.11207) introduces a governance framework grounded in control theory to oversee interactions among various large language model (LLM) agents with conflicting aims. Conducted in a simulated financial services context, the research tackles the issue of conversational collapse that arises when two agents with fundamentally opposing objectives engage without a common goal function. The proposed solution, termed the Experience Orchestrator (EO), integrates three components: a Contextual Bandit (CB) for content selection based on real-world web analytics, a PID controller to ensure behavioral consistency through dynamic schema constraints, and a POMDP belief tracker for sustaining a probabilistic model of visitor states. The findings indicate that this governance layer can effectively replace the absent goal function, averting collapse and fulfilling specified objectives. The paper can be accessed on arXiv with the identifier 2608.11207.
Key facts
- Paper ID: arXiv:2608.11207
- Announcement type: new
- Focus: multi-LLM agent systems with opposing objectives
- Proposed solution: Experience Orchestrator (EO)
- EO uses Contextual Bandit, PID controller, and POMDP belief tracker
- Simulated environment: financial services
- Goal: guide visitor to advisor contact
- Visitor exhibits psychologically realistic resistance
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv