Co-Curated Biennials Should Embrace Disagreement
Most co-curated biennials present a facade of harmony in their catalogues and press statements, but the author argues that differing perspectives among curators are not a flaw to be hidden. Instead, these tensions can enrich the exhibition. The piece encourages embracing awkwardness and conflict as productive forces in biennial curation, suggesting that true collaboration involves acknowledging and working through disagreements rather than pretending they don't exist.
Key facts
- Co-curated biennials often present a vision of perfect harmony in catalogues and press statements.
- Differing perspectives among curators are seen as no bad thing.
- The article is an opinion piece on biennial curation.
- The source is Ocula Magazine.
- The article title is 'Co-Curated Biennials Are Rarely Harmonious. Why Not Embrace This?'
- The article was published on Ocula.com.
- The article is categorized under 'opinion'.
- The article references the 2026 biennial cycle.
Entities
Institutions
- Ocula Magazine