ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

CNN Models Compared for GAN-Generated Fake Image Detection

other · 2026-05-22

A recent study published on arXiv (2605.20971) investigates the performance of four pretrained CNN models—VGG16, ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, and XceptionNet—in identifying images altered by GANs. The researchers implemented a standardized preprocessing approach involving resizing, normalization, and augmentation to mitigate class imbalance. The models were assessed based on Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. VGG16 recorded the highest accuracy at 91%, while XceptionNet, ResNet50, and EfficientNetB0 all achieved 90%. Although EfficientNetB0 demonstrated greater sensitivity to manipulated images, it exhibited diminished reliability with authentic samples, highlighting a bias due to imbalance. The study acknowledges limitations such as dataset imbalance, overfitting, and restricted interpretability that could impact robustness across different domains.

Key facts

  • Study compares VGG16, ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, and XceptionNet for fake image detection
  • Dataset processed with resizing, normalization, and augmentation
  • VGG16 achieved highest accuracy at 91%
  • XceptionNet, ResNet50, EfficientNetB0 each reached 90%
  • EfficientNetB0 showed stronger sensitivity to fakes but reduced reliability on real samples
  • Limitations include dataset imbalance, overfitting, and limited interpretability
  • Published on arXiv with ID 2605.20971
  • Focus on GAN-based image manipulation detection

Entities

Institutions

  • arXiv

Sources