Christophe Kihm critiques the French debate on curatorial authorship and terminology
In the February 2010 issue of art press n°364, Christophe Kihm addresses the ongoing discussion in France among critics and curators regarding the distinction between "curator" and "commissaire d'exposition," as well as the question of whether curators should be considered authors. He posits that the "authority of the author" is primarily a French concern with little global significance, deeming the debate uninteresting as it merely mirrors social standings. Kihm stresses the importance of grasping the social contexts of curatorial roles and advocates for increased investigation into curators' responsibilities, skills, and techniques, acknowledging that while some studies have emerged in French universities, they are still limited. He expresses hope that this topic will spur additional research.
Key facts
- Editorial by Christophe Kihm in art press n°364, February 2010.
- Debate in France among curators and critics about the profession of exhibition curator.
- Two main points: terminology (curator vs. curateur vs. commissaire d'exposition) and authorship (curator as author).
- Kihm considers the authorship issue a French problem with little international resonance.
- Kihm argues the debate is unproductive as it focuses on social and symbolic positions.
- Kihm calls for understanding the concrete and abstract work of curating.
- Research on exhibitions has started in French universities and more in England and the US.
- Studies on the tasks of the curator are still few.
- Kihm hopes the dossier in the issue will promote such research.
Entities
Artists
- Christophe Kihm
Institutions
- art press
Locations
- France
- England
- United States
Sources
- artpress —