ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Checklist for Local Earmarked Arts Taxes

opinion-review · 2026-04-30

Michael Rushton offers a personal checklist for proposing local earmarked taxes for arts funding, based on his experience teaching about the topic. Key questions include: defining the specific problem to solve, determining fund distribution (grants to individuals, nonprofits, or big institutions), expanding the coalition beyond arts to include museums, gardens, zoos, and bike paths, choosing an earmarked tax over general fund financing, selecting an appropriate geographic scale (e.g., metro Denver's seven-county district), deciding whether legacy institutions get guaranteed shares, and picking a tax base (sales tax, hotel tax, property tax) while avoiding regressive options like head taxes, lottery profits, or cigarette taxes. He critiques Portland's proposed streaming levy and notes that property tax increases are unpopular and can lower property values.

Key facts

  • Michael Rushton wrote a checklist for local earmarked arts taxes.
  • The checklist is based on his teaching experience.
  • Questions include: what problem to solve, how to distribute funds, whether to include non-arts entities, why use an earmarked tax, geographic scale, guaranteed shares for big institutions, and tax base choice.
  • Examples cited: metro Denver's seven-county arts district, Salt Lake County's sales tax, St. Louis property tax.
  • Portland's proposed streaming levy is criticized as regressive.
  • Regressive tax bases include head taxes, lottery profits, and cigarette taxes.
  • The article was cross-posted on Michael Rushton's Substack.
  • The original source is ArtsJournal.

Entities

Artists

  • Michael Rushton

Institutions

  • ArtsJournal
  • Substack

Locations

  • Portland
  • Oregon
  • Denver
  • Colorado
  • Salt Lake County
  • Utah
  • St. Louis
  • Missouri
  • Cleveland
  • Ohio
  • Oakland County
  • Michigan
  • Detroit
  • Woodward Avenue

Sources