ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Caterina Mainardis Questions the Apollonian/Dionysian Framework and Defends Relational Art

opinion-review · 2026-08-18

In an essay published in August 2026 on Artribune, critic Caterina Mainardis confronts art critics who claim their frameworks are unbiased. She contends that the Apollonian/Dionysian divide cannot be disproven and cautions against revealing hidden agendas, which remain unprovable. Mainardis critiques the reliance on 'formal and conceptual efficacy' as a subjective measure and suggests a new criterion: the ability to effect genuine change in individuals, particularly in art therapy and community practices that are frequently overlooked by mainstream criticism. She offers three questions for assessing critical insights and cites Roberto Ago's teachings on relational art, featuring images from '1+1. L'arte relazionale' at Fondazione MAXXI. Mainardis calls for criticism to incorporate a variety of viewpoints and arguments.

Key facts

  • Caterina Mainardis authored the essay on Artribune in August 2026
  • The essay critiques the Apollonian/Dionysian dichotomy as unfalsifiable
  • Mainardis argues that formal and conceptual efficacy is a situated judgment, not objective fact
  • She introduces a third criterion: art as relational device measured by real change in participants
  • Art therapy and community practice are cited as historically marginalized forms of art
  • The essay references Roberto Ago's lesson on relational art
  • Photographs from the exhibition '1+1. L'arte relazionale' at Fondazione MAXXI are included
  • Mainardis proposes three questions for readers to evaluate critical claims

Entities

Artists

  • Caterina Mainardis
  • Roberto Ago
  • Musacchio & Pasqualini

Institutions

  • Artribune
  • Fondazione MAXXI
  • MUSA

Sources