Carole Talon-Hugon's 'L'arte sotto controllo' Criticized as Flawed Anti-PC Pamphlet
Marco Enrico Giacomelli critiques Carole Talon-Hugon's book 'L'arte sotto controllo' (Johan and Levi, 2020), describing it as an inadequately researched critique of contemporary art. He claims she selectively chooses examples, relies on secondary sources, and distorts the representation of artworks. Giacomelli points out inaccuracies, such as Art Basel Cities not being an art fair, Manifesta's biennial host city rotation, and the rejection of Duchamp's Fountain by the Society of Independent Artists. He finds the book's organization lacking, with a feeble discussion on art's socio-political significance, a cursory historical perspective, and an overly simplistic stance against socially engaged art's autonomy. Ultimately, he argues that the book perpetuates a limited Western viewpoint.
Key facts
- Carole Talon-Hugon's 'L'arte sotto controllo' published by Johan and Levi in 2020, 110 pages, €13.
- Book criticized for relying on Le Monde articles and French sources.
- Factual errors: Art Basel Cities is not a fair; Manifesta changes city biennially.
- Duchamp's Fountain rejected by Society of Independent Artists in 1917.
- Reviewer notes omission of German Idealism (Kant, Hegel) and Frida Kahlo.
- Talon-Hugon argues socially engaged art cannot combine autonomy with moral efficacy.
- Banksy not cited despite contradicting the book's claims.
- Jacques Rancière's 'Malaise in Aesthetics' (2004) invoked as unaddressed counterpoint.
Entities
Artists
- Jeff Koons
- Marcel Duchamp
- Kent Monkman
- Kahlil Joseph
- Banksy
- Frida Kahlo
- Stieg Larsson
- George Wilson Knight
Institutions
- Johan and Levi
- Artribune
- Le Monde
- Society of Independent Artists
- Festival d'Avignon
- Art Basel Cities
- Manifesta
- Biennale di Venezia
- Maretti Editore
- ETS
Locations
- Monza
- Italy
- France
- Avignon
- Palermo
- Paris
- New Jersey
- Canada