Bernard Stiegler on Cinema, Consciousness, and Hyperindustrial Culture
In a 2001 discussion, philosopher Bernard Stiegler reflects on his work "Le Temps du cinéma ou la question du mal-être" (Galilée, 2001), which is the third installment of "La Technique et le temps." He posits that the cultural industry’s creation of temporal artifacts facilitates an industrial approach to temporalizing consciousness. Unlike the Frankfurt School, Stiegler centers his examination on technical items such as film and recorded music, introducing the concept of tertiary retention to illustrate how these recorded entities align with consciousness. He warns of a shift towards a hyperindustrial era where material and symbolic goods converge, criticizing the uniformity of secondary retentions. Stiegler advocates for collective individuation through mnemo-technologies and regards art as a néguentropic influence, urging a revival of critical aesthetic analysis. He has assumed a new position at IRCAM.
Key facts
- Bernard Stiegler published 'Le Temps du cinéma ou la question du mal-être' in 2001.
- The book is the third volume of 'La Technique et le temps.'
- Stiegler defines a temporal object as one whose flow coincides with the flow of consciousness.
- He introduces tertiary retention as externalized memory (e.g., phonograms, films).
- Stiegler argues that recorded temporal objects enable synchronization of consciousness.
- He claims we are moving from an industrial to a hyperindustrial stage.
- Stiegler critiques the homogenization of secondary retentions through mass media.
- He took up a new role at IRCAM at the time of the interview.
- Stiegler draws on Husserl, Kant, and Simondon.
- He calls art a néguentropic factor that diachronizes synchrony.
Entities
Artists
- Bernard Stiegler
Institutions
- INA
- IRCAM
- Galilée
- Centre Pompidou
- British Paramount
- VisNews
Locations
- France
Sources
- artpress —