Average Distance Approximation for Static Large Graphs: arXiv Study
A recent study published on arXiv (ID 2608.16916) investigates methods for determining average distances within extensive networks. It compares two primary techniques: Random Walk sampling and landmark-based strategies, specifically the Size Estimation Framework (SEF) and Eppstein-Wang (EW) algorithm. The Random Walk approach requires a minimum of 15% of nodes to produce reliable results, demanding significant resources for large graphs. Conversely, landmark methods utilize probabilistic structures like HyperLogLog, which enhance neighbor searching. SEF stands out for its efficient memory usage, while EW offers superior accuracy and faster computation, providing insights into optimal algorithm selections for network analysis.
Key facts
- The paper is available on arXiv with ID 2608.16916
- The study compares Random Walk and landmark-based methods for average distance approximation
- Random Walk requires at least 15% of nodes for accuracy and is computationally expensive
- Landmark-based methods use HyperLogLog for memory-efficient exploration
- SEF has better memory efficiency
- EW has higher accuracy with lower computation time
- Experiments were done on static, undirected, unweighted graphs
- The announcement type is Cross
Entities
—