ArXiv to ban authors for a year if they use AI without checking

ArXiv, the preprint repository that offers open access, has introduced a new policy aimed at penalizing authors who submit papers containing obvious instances of unverified AI-generated content. On Thursday, Thomas Dietterich, who leads ArXiv's computer science section, stated that submissions with "incontrovertible evidence" of unverified outputs from language models—like fabricated references or comments—will result in a one-year ban for the authors. Following this period, any new submissions must receive acceptance from a reputable peer-reviewed source. This policy does not prohibit the use of language models; instead, it mandates that authors ensure the accuracy of their content. Dietterich explained to 404 Media that this will operate as a "one-strike" policy, where moderators will identify issues, and section chairs will verify evidence before enforcing penalties, allowing authors to appeal. After over two decades hosted by Cornell, ArXiv is transitioning to an independent nonprofit to secure additional funding for AI-related challenges. The repository has already mandated endorsements from established authors for first-time submitters. Recent peer-reviewed studies have indicated a rise in fabricated citations within biomedical research, likely attributed to language models.