ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

arXiv Paper on Optimistic Policy Learning with Pessimistic Adversaries in Decision Systems

ai-technology · 2026-04-20

A research article entitled "Optimistic Policy Learning under Pessimistic Adversaries with Regret and Violation Guarantees" has been made available on arXiv, bearing the identifier arXiv:2604.14243v2. This study focuses on decision-making systems that function in contexts where state transitions are influenced not only by the agent's actions but also by external elements beyond its control, including rival agents, environmental changes, or strategic opponents. The state evolution is mathematically represented as s_{h+1} = f(s_h, a_h, \bar{a}_h) + ω_h, where a_h denotes the agent's action, \bar{a}_h signifies the adversarial or external action, and ω_h represents additive noise. Neglecting these external influences can result in policies that appear optimal in theory but fail dramatically in practice, particularly when safety constraints are involved. Traditional Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) models assume that the agent solely drives state changes, a premise that falters in safety-critical scenarios. While existing robust reinforcement learning methods tackle this issue through distributional robustness concerning transition kernels, they often overlook the strategic interplay between the agent and external factors. This paper introduces techniques that provide guarantees on both regret and constraint violations in adversarial environments.

Key facts

  • Paper titled "Optimistic Policy Learning under Pessimistic Adversaries with Regret and Violation Guarantees"
  • Published on arXiv with identifier arXiv:2604.14243v2
  • Addresses decision-making systems with exogenous factors like adversaries or disturbances
  • State transition model: s_{h+1} = f(s_h, a_h, \bar{a}_h) + ω_h
  • Ignoring external factors can cause catastrophic failure in deployment
  • Standard Constrained MDP formulations assume agent is sole driver of state evolution
  • Existing robust RL uses distributional robustness over transition kernels
  • Proposes methods with guarantees on regret and constraint violation

Entities

Institutions

  • arXiv

Sources