Art Criticism's Declining Impact and the Absence of Controversial Responses in Contemporary Art
In the art sector, strong reactions to negative critiques are uncommon, contrasting with other cultural arenas. This lack of response stems from the waning influence of art criticism, as market dynamics and curators often dictate value. Many critiques emerge after exhibitions, which diminishes their effect, and galleries may consider the audience secondary. The focus of critical writing has shifted towards advocacy, which lessens the likelihood of controversy. Artists generally handle unfavorable reviews privately. A notable incident involved Marco Goecke, who faced suspension and investigation for smearing critic Wiebke Hüster with dog feces in Berlin, an act provoked by her negative assessment of his ballet. Historical instances of backlash include Jeanette Winterson and Steven Berkoff, while some artists express their disappointment without aggression, preferring dialogue.
Key facts
- Marco Goecke was suspended and faced a police investigation after smearing critic Wiebke Hüster with dog feces in Berlin
- The incident followed Hüster's negative review of Goecke's Hanover State Opera ballet production
- Art criticism has lost much of its authority to market forces and curators
- Many art reviews are published after exhibitions have closed, limiting their impact
- Critical writing has increasingly shifted toward advocacy rather than negative critique
- Artist Paul McCarthy was reportedly depressed for two weeks after a negative review
- The late gallerist Leslie Waddington demanded a critic's dismissal over a negative review
- Critic Adrian Searle received a parcel containing excrement and threatening phone calls
Entities
Artists
- Marco Goecke
- Wiebke Hüster
- Jeanette Winterson
- Steven Berkoff
- Adrian Searle
- Leslie Waddington
- Susan Hiller
- Paul McCarthy
Institutions
- Hanover State Opera
- Time Out
- Artforum
- The Guardian
Locations
- Germany
- Berlin
- Hanover
- London