Americans Skeptical of Radical Life Extension to 120 Years

A report from Quartz reveals that despite the enthusiasm of futurists and transhumanists for radical life extension, Americans are largely uninterested in living to 120 or beyond. The article highlights prominent advocates such as Ray Kurzweil, who promotes supplements and biochemical reset, and Aubrey de Grey, who predicts that some alive today could live 1,000 years thanks to emerging anti-aging techniques. Russian media millionaire Dmitry Itskov suggests mind uploading to technological carriers, while other transhumanists advocate for nanotechnology, cryonics, and medical advances as imminent means of extending life. The piece underscores a disconnect between the ambitions of these technologists and public sentiment, suggesting that the desire for extreme longevity is not widespread among Americans. The report does not provide specific survey data but frames the issue as a cultural and ethical debate. It raises questions about the societal implications of life extension, including resource allocation and the meaning of life. The article is part of a broader discourse on the future of aging and technology, reflecting ongoing interest in the topic within scientific and futuristic communities.