Alva Noë's 'Strange Tools' Critiqued as Self-Referential Philosophy of Art

Alva Noë's 2015 book 'Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature' presents a philosophical argument that art functions as a technology for self-investigation. The UC Berkeley professor, known for theories of perception, contends that both art and philosophy share a meta-cognitive purpose rather than practical utility. Published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux/Hill and Wang, the work draws criticism for relying on personal anecdotes and unsupported assertions. Reviewers note Noë's approach echoes modernist theories while excluding much historical art. His comparison of choreography to displaying human nature exemplifies arguments deemed problematic. The text incorporates numerous personal digressions, from his artist father to childhood museum visits. Critics argue these elements shift focus from rigorous philosophy toward autobiography. Despite aiming for accessibility, the book's repetitive prose and sweeping generalizations alienate readers seeking substantive analysis.