ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

AI's Productivity Paradox Echoes 1980s Tech Disappointments

ai-technology · 2026-04-20

A study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research in February 2025 revealed that almost 90% of companies indicated that AI had no effect on employment or productivity in the last three years. This aligns with Robert Solow's 1987 remarks regarding productivity paradoxes. Among 6,000 executives surveyed, two-thirds reported utilizing AI for merely 1.5 hours each week, and 25% did not engage with it at all. An analysis by the Financial Times highlighted that 374 S&P 500 firms spoke favorably of AI, yet tangible productivity improvements were hard to find. Despite corporate AI investments surpassing $250 billion in 2024, economists raised concerns about the returns. Conflicting findings emerged, with a Federal Reserve report citing a 1.9% productivity rise since ChatGPT's launch, while a 2024 MIT study anticipated only a 0.5% increase over the next decade.

Key facts

  • Nearly 90% of firms reported AI had no impact on employment or productivity over the last three years, per a February 2025 NBER study.
  • Robert Solow identified the productivity paradox in 1987, noting computers were everywhere but not in productivity statistics.
  • About two-thirds of executives use AI for only 1.5 hours weekly, with 25% not using it at all.
  • Corporate AI investments exceeded $250 billion in 2024.
  • Torsten Slok stated AI is absent from macroeconomic data, echoing Solow's observation.
  • A Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis report found a 1.9% productivity increase since ChatGPT's late-2022 launch.
  • A 2024 MIT study projected a 0.5% productivity increase over the next decade, deemed disappointing by Daron Acemoglu.
  • Boston Consulting Group research identified 'AI brain fry' from using four or more tools, reducing productivity.

Entities

Institutions

  • National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Financial Times
  • Apollo
  • Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
  • MIT
  • ManpowerGroup
  • Boston Consulting Group
  • IBM
  • Stanford University
  • Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research
  • Pimco
  • Fortune.com
  • New York Times Book Review

Locations

  • U.S.
  • U.K.
  • Germany
  • Australia

Sources