AI Agents, Not Just Data, Will Accelerate Science, Argues Eric Schmidt
In a Technology Review essay, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Suhas Mahesh argue that while DeepMind's AlphaFold demonstrated AI's potential in science, its data-intensive approach is not the best template for future breakthroughs. They contend that AI agents—reasoning engines with access to tools—will drive scientific acceleration by mimicking human reasoning under uncertainty. The authors cite AlphaFold's reliance on the Protein Data Bank, which took 53 years and $21 billion to assemble, as an example of the rarity of such conditions. They highlight Google's AI Co-Scientist, which independently formulated a correct hypothesis about antibiotic resistance spread that took Imperial College London researchers a decade to prove. Agents offer structural fixes for reproducibility, amplify scientific memory, and increase speed, potentially transforming science as profoundly as calculus or the computer. The essay was published on August 10, 2026.
Key facts
- Eric Schmidt and Suhas Mahesh authored the essay.
- AlphaFold won part of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
- AlphaFold was trained on the Protein Data Bank, which took 53 years and $21 billion to assemble.
- Google's AI Co-Scientist correctly hypothesized that antibiotic resistance spreads via bacterial viruses.
- Imperial College London researchers took a decade to reach the same conclusion.
- Agents automatically log their actions, aiding reproducibility.
- Agents can read a thousand papers in an hour and design 500 molecules.
- The essay was published in Technology Review on August 10, 2026.
Entities
Artists
- Demis Hassabis
- John Jumper
- Eric Schmidt
- Suhas Mahesh
- Maya Levin
- Albert Michelson
- Stephen Hawking
Institutions
- Google DeepMind
- Technology Review
- Imperial College London
- Schmidt Sciences
- US National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology
- Protein Data Bank
Locations
- United States
- United Kingdom