13 Artists and Curators on the Role of Art Criticism Today
Artribune published insights from 13 artists and curators regarding the current significance of art criticism. Participants included Chenxiao Du (Beijing), Sara Tacchi (San Severino), Simone Pellizzari (Busto Arsizio), Nicole Santamaria (Aosta), Benedetta Cerea (Bergamo), Olmo Marini (Florence), Emma Cometto (Milan), Oscar Formacio Mendoza (Cholula, Mexico), Gao Yuxin (Hefei, China), Xinjing Zang (Jinan, China), Majorn Schirripa (Milan), Yiweng Lu (Hangzhou, China), and Chengrui Peng (Changsha, China). Produced by NABA students, their perspectives differ: Du views criticism as guidance; Tacchi underscores the importance of inquiry; Pellizzari cautions against excessive conceptualism; Santamaria critiques hollow criticism; Cerea advocates for emotional critique; Marini highlights interpretation; Cometto promotes sharpness; Formacio Mendoza desires liberation from economic constraints; Gao discusses the critic-artist relationship; Zang perceives criticism as a connector; Schirripa emphasizes autonomy; Lu regards it as supportive; Peng points out its relevance to social matters.
Key facts
- 13 artists and curators responded to the question 'What is art criticism and its role today?'
- Contributors include Chenxiao Du, Sara Tacchi, Simone Pellizzari, Nicole Santamaria, Benedetta Cerea, Olmo Marini, Emma Cometto, Oscar Formacio Mendoza, Gao Yuxin, Xinjing Zang, Majorn Schirripa, Yiweng Lu, and Chengrui Peng.
- The article was produced as a classroom exercise by students of the Biennial in Visual Arts and Curatorial Studies at NABA – Nuova Accademia di Belle Arti di Milano.
- Chenxiao Du describes criticism as orientation and organization, not control.
- Sara Tacchi emphasizes slowing down the gaze and questioning institutional, economic, and cultural dynamics.
- Simone Pellizzari warns against excessive conceptualism and encourages viewers to disagree with curatorial texts.
- Nicole Santamaria criticizes empty criticism and a competition to make works fascinating.
- Benedetta Cerea calls for visceral, discomforting criticism that provokes a reaction.
- Olmo Marini highlights the importance of interpreting one's time to transcend context.
- Emma Cometto advocates for active, incisive criticism that denounces and offers solid viewpoints.
- Oscar Formacio Mendoza wants art freed from industrial economic models and emphasizes imagination.
- Gao Yuxin describes a dynamic balance between critic and artist, like a scale.
- Xinjing Zang sees criticism as a bridge between sensibility and rationality, transforming experience into reflection.
- Majorn Schirripa stresses independence from commercial logic and cross-cultural resonance.
- Yiweng Lu values criticism as accompaniment rather than judgment, respecting freedom and uniqueness.
- Chengrui Peng notes the role of criticism in interpreting complex works and addressing social issues in a digital age.
Entities
Artists
- Chenxiao Du
- Sara Tacchi
- Simone Pellizzari
- Nicole Santamaria
- Benedetta Cerea
- Olmo Marini
- Emma Cometto
- Oscar Formacio Mendoza
- Gao Yuxin
- Xinjing Zang
- Majorn Schirripa
- Yiweng Lu
- Chengrui Peng
Institutions
- Artribune
- NABA – Nuova Accademia di Belle Arti di Milano
Locations
- Beijing
- China
- San Severino
- Busto Arsizio
- Aosta
- Bergamo
- Florence
- Milan
- Cholula
- Mexico
- Hefei
- Jinan
- Hangzhou
- Changsha