Supreme Court Limits Copyright Liability for Internet Providers in Piracy Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on March 25, 2026, that internet service providers are generally not liable for copyright infringement by their users, even when aware of piracy activities. The decision overturned a $1 billion verdict against Cox Cable in a lawsuit brought by Sony, which had cited numerous instances of customers sharing copyrighted music and movies. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that providing general internet access does not constitute contributory infringement without specific intent to facilitate piracy. This ruling contrasts with earlier decisions against file-sharing services like Grokster and Napster, establishing a higher threshold for holding providers accountable.
Key facts
- The Supreme Court issued a 9-0 ruling on March 25, 2026
- The decision overturned a $1 billion verdict against Cox Cable in Sony's copyright lawsuit
- Justice Clarence Thomas authored the opinion stating internet providers aren't liable for general service with knowledge of some infringement
- The ruling distinguishes from earlier cases against file-sharing services Grokster and Napster
- Cox argued that liability could bankrupt providers for actions they cannot prevent
Entities
Institutions
- Supreme Court
- Sony
- Cox Cable
Locations
- Washington D.C.