Critique of Arthur Danto's 'After the End of Art' Theory and Reflections on Posthistorical Culture
A critical engagement with Arthur Danto's 1995 book 'After the End of Art' forms the basis for a broader analysis of cultural periods. Danto's central thesis posits that Andy Warhol's 1964 'Brillo Boxes' marked the end of art by making anything potentially art, ushering in a posthistorical era. The critique identifies several flaws in this argument, including its rigid Hegelian historical framework and the problematic assumption of a linear progression in art history, exemplified by Danto's citation of Gombrich and Plato regarding archaic art forms. The author disputes Danto's characterization of artists like Vincent van Gogh and Paul Gauguin as the sole key innovators of 19th-century French painting and challenges the notion that cubism did not develop beyond impressionism. References are made to other theorists like Hans Belting, Clement Greenberg, and Leo Steinberg. The response contextualizes Danto's 'end of art' concept alongside Francis Fukuyama's 'End of History,' suggesting both ideas felt more legitimate in the 1980s and 1990s. The author proposes that a distinct 'posthistorical' cultural period existed roughly from the fall of the Berlin Wall to the 2016 U.S. presidential election, characterized by a sense of being outside history. This era, now viewed as a 'vacation from history,' fostered a specific productivity and optimism. The critique argues that art has since re-entered history, partly due to the internet's dominance in the 2010s, which relativized cultural beliefs. Danto's idea of unlimited artistic freedom post-Warhol is questioned, noting practical and social constraints. The current art world's market pressures and the challenge for artists to discover genuine desires within a commercialized system are highlighted as contemporary problems. The author plans to further develop these ideas, linking the internet's role as both a problem and a potential, albeit pessimistic, solution for contemporary artistic practice.
Key facts
- Arthur Danto's book 'After the End of Art' was published in 1995.
- Danto's theory centers on Andy Warhol's 1964 'Brillo Boxes' as ending art by making everything potential art.
- The critique challenges Danto's Hegelian view of history as a rigid, linear progression.
- Danto's historical claims include viewing van Gogh and Gauguin as key 19th-century innovators and questioning cubism's development beyond impressionism.
- The 'end of art' concept is paralleled with Francis Fukuyama's 'End of History' thesis.
- A proposed 'posthistorical' cultural period lasted from the fall of the Berlin Wall to the 2016 U.S. election.
- The internet's rise in the 2010s is cited as a factor in art re-entering history.
- The author criticizes the contemporary art market for stifling genuine artistic discovery and freedom.
Entities
Artists
- Andy Warhol
- Vincent van Gogh
- Paul Gauguin
- Merlin Carpenter
- Pollaiuolo
- Michelangelo
- Manet
- Jackson Pollock
- Rosemarie Trockel
- Daidalos
Institutions
- Taglialatella Galleries
- New York Times
- PBS
Locations
- Berlin
- Germany
- Ukraine
- Gaza